Your opinion & share...
Latest topics
» interesting Fate line / Hand? Your Reading Please
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Today at 2:56 pm by pravin kumar

» interesting Fate line?
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Today at 2:55 pm by pravin kumar

» Want to know about my marriage
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Today at 2:53 pm by pravin kumar

» Pentagram in Palm lines?
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Thu Nov 07, 2019 9:44 pm by Cattblack5

» Voltage Line? (= Johnny Fincham's 'Intensity Line'!)
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Sun Nov 03, 2019 8:23 am by 1970

» Work and children
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Sun Oct 20, 2019 12:54 pm by Stefania

» Request for a general read and focussed on sun mount signs
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:45 am by nishaghai

» Horizontal lines and Grilles on fingerprints
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:34 am by nishaghai

» A CRY FOR HELP
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:29 am by nishaghai

» looks like a loop on the palm but not a loop?
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Mon Sep 30, 2019 7:06 pm by sonu21

» Michael 'Air' Jordan: hands of a basketball superstar!
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:48 am by Whitewash112358

» I am very unlucky in terms of finding a job. Please help.
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Sat Sep 21, 2019 11:53 am by Cev

» Cant figure out why my head line looks like it does!!
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Thu Sep 19, 2019 5:41 am by nishaghai

» Got a moment...please read my palm :)
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Thu Sep 19, 2019 5:36 am by nishaghai

» hello there
deleted deleted Icon_minitime1Sat Sep 07, 2019 7:57 am by JD

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Who is online?
In total there are 25 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 25 Guests

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 293 on Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:22 am
Moderators & partners

• Discover the Modern Hand Reading Forum partners:

Would you like to see your website listed?

Modern Hand Reading Forum Partners

Pointing finger: check this out!

Statistics
We have 5772 registered users
The newest registered user is rajusharma

Our users have posted a total of 46655 messages in 4782 subjects
Top posting users this week
pravin kumar
deleted deleted Voting17deleted deleted Voting19deleted deleted Voting18 
muhammadimrankhan706
deleted deleted Voting17deleted deleted Voting19deleted deleted Voting18 

Recommendations

• The FREE hand reading services at the Modern Hand Reading Forum are being continued in 2019 with the assistance of Google adsense!


Pointing finger: check this out!



Google+
MAJOR HAND READING SYNONYMS
Palmistry, Palm Reading, Hand Analysis, Chirology & Chiromancy.

Learn how to read hands according the Modern Hand Reading paradigm & you can use this forum as your palm reading guide!

deleted deleted

Go down

deleted deleted Empty deleted deleted

Post  kiwihands on Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:40 am

deleted


Last edited by kiwihands on Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:07 pm; edited 1 time in total

kiwihands

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-01-09
Location : nowhere

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:31 am

Hi Kiwi,

Here is some of our earlier discussion:

Patti wrote:deleted deleted Left_i10

deleted deleted Left_i11

I think your left index is a small ulnar loop.

Martijn (admin) wrote:
... Regarding your left index finger, yes there are some irregular ridge lines inside but these do not make any well defined pattern, nor a triradius, etc. - though I do see 5 ending ridge lines in a row in the upper center of the loop.

So, therefore we can simply continue to speak about an ULNAR LOOP.

deleted deleted 5443094040_5d7a06bb76_z
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:51 am

kiwihands wrote:Hi dermatoglyphics experts,

this print of mine has been pronounced a loop by Martijn a while ago, but it's still rattling around in my head as not quite sure. So I finally sat back down with the FBI handbook and took a good print to get to the bottom of this, but I'm STILL not sure. Argh. Patti, if you could chip in your opinion, that would be awesome!

Did I find the type lines (green), delta (red), and looping ridges (blue) correctly?
And what do you think about the light blue line? It looks like an appendage on the main (dark blue) loop to me, in which case the recurve would be spoilt. Or would you keep going from the light blue to the dark blue ridge and see that as the main recurve, rather than an appendage?

deleted deleted Left-i10

Thanks!

I think the print is attempting to be a whorl based on it's core, which would have likely been the initial formation of the ridge pattern. It is definitely spoiled as a whorl.

The print presents a slightly different perspective of the details than the earlier photo. It still appears that there's a ridge count of at least one for it to qualify as a loop. I'll take a closer look tomorrow.
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:18 pm

My thought at the moment is that the first dark blue line in front of the delta is ridge count 1, then the bulging rod at the center is the core. We lose the 2nd ridge count because of the appendage. It has a delta, a core and a ridge count of 1 which makes it a loop.


Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Lynn on Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:14 am

Patti's posts makes sense to me. I'd also say it is a loop.

___________________________________________
Lynn
www.handanalysis.co.uk
Lynn
Lynn

Posts : 2447
Join date : 2010-07-24
Location : Devon, England

http://www.handanalysis.co.uk

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Martijn (admin) on Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:45 am

kiwihands wrote:Hi dermatoglyphics experts,

this print of mine has been pronounced a loop by Martijn a while ago, but it's still rattling around in my head as not quite sure. So I finally sat back down with the FBI handbook and took a good print to get to the bottom of this, but I'm STILL not sure. Argh. Patti, if you could chip in your opinion, that would be awesome!

Did I find the type lines (green), delta (red), and looping ridges (blue) correctly?
And what do you think about the light blue line? It looks like an appendage on the main (dark blue) loop to me, in which case the recurve would be spoilt. Or would you keep going from the light blue to the dark blue ridge and see that as the main recurve, rather than an appendage?

deleted deleted Left-i10

Thanks!

Hi Kiwihands,

Now that Patti & Lynn have sort of confirmed my earlier assessment, I have another suggestion for you:

I noticed that you tried to draw the FBI's type lines... but these should always be just two lines - not the larger number of lines that you have drawn in your left picture. So maybe your confusion (partly) results from not finding the correct type lines?


PS. Regarding your confusion, be aware: in the FBI system the 'type lines' are not decisive for whether a pattern is a loop (or whorl).

___________________________________________
sunny

Martijn van Mensvoort
Hand researcher & psychologist in The Netherlands (Holland)
Presents: Multi-Perspective Palm Reading + the Global Palm Reading Network
Martijn (admin)
Martijn (admin)
Admin

Posts : 5257
Join date : 2010-07-23
Location : The Netherlands

http://www.handresearch.com

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:45 pm

Patti wrote:
Martijn (admin) wrote:
... Regarding your left index finger, yes there are some irregular ridge lines inside but these do not make any well defined pattern, nor a triradius, etc. - though I do see 5 ending ridge lines in a row in the upper center of the loop.

So, therefore we can simply continue to speak about an ULNAR LOOP.

Although the newer print does clearly show that there is a triradius, I noticed in your description here, Martijn, that you have suggested a lack of a triradius results in a loop, but if there were not triradius, in this case, it would have been a tented arch.

(p.s.: I think Kiwi was aware of the innermost parallel lines creating the type lines in her drawing.)
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  kiwihands on Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Hi Patti, Lynn, and Martijn,

Thanks heaps for your patience clearing up my questions! I think second time around I'm finally getting it ... Wink What confused me most was the way that the only proper looping ridge was spoilt by the appendage: without the presence of an unspoilt loop, I didn't even think of counting the short ridge in front of the delta. That's where I went wrong!

And yep, I did get a bit carried away with the type lines, thanks for the reminder that there should be just two of them.

Thanks!

kiwihands

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-01-09
Location : nowhere

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:17 pm

kiwihands wrote:Hi Patti, Lynn, and Martijn,

Thanks heaps for your patience clearing up my questions! I think second time around I'm finally getting it ... Wink What confused me most was the way that the only proper looping ridge was spoilt by the appendage: without the presence of an unspoilt loop, I didn't even think of counting the short ridge in front of the delta. That's where I went wrong!

And yep, I did get a bit carried away with the type lines, thanks for the reminder that there should be just two of them.

Thanks!

It took a little thinking through because the one ridge in front of the delta attaches to the type line. It can also be seen as a radiant representing the loop or pattern field of ridges.

What convinced me was example 53 in the FBI's book that showed the same ridge line as the first count. Then it would seem since you only need one ridge count between the core and delta it qualifies as a loop.

deleted deleted Fig05310
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Martijn (admin) on Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:05 am

Patti wrote:
Patti wrote:
Martijn (admin) wrote:
... Regarding your left index finger, yes there are some irregular ridge lines inside but these do not make any well defined pattern, nor a triradius, etc. - though I do see 5 ending ridge lines in a row in the upper center of the loop.

So, therefore we can simply continue to speak about an ULNAR LOOP.

Although the newer print does clearly show that there is a triradius, I noticed in your description here, Martijn, that you have suggested a lack of a triradius results in a loop, but if there were not triradius, in this case, it would have been a tented arch.

(p.s.: I think Kiwi was aware of the innermost parallel lines creating the type lines in her drawing.)

Hi Patti,

No, in that passage I considered the possibility of the presence of a second triradius at the center of the pattern area. And because there is no such second triradius... the fingerprint can not be a whorl, and therefore resulting in a loop.

(The context outside the quoted-passage in the other topic should have made you understand this - sorrry, I don't recall in which topic I made that comment)

___________________________________________
sunny

Martijn van Mensvoort
Hand researcher & psychologist in The Netherlands (Holland)
Presents: Multi-Perspective Palm Reading + the Global Palm Reading Network
Martijn (admin)
Martijn (admin)
Admin

Posts : 5257
Join date : 2010-07-23
Location : The Netherlands

http://www.handresearch.com

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Martijn (admin) on Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:08 am

kiwihands wrote:...

And yep, I did get a bit carried away with the type lines, thanks for the reminder that there should be just two of them.

Thanks!

Okay, great to know that you are aware of how the FBI has described the 'type lines'.

Thumbs up!

___________________________________________
sunny

Martijn van Mensvoort
Hand researcher & psychologist in The Netherlands (Holland)
Presents: Multi-Perspective Palm Reading + the Global Palm Reading Network
Martijn (admin)
Martijn (admin)
Admin

Posts : 5257
Join date : 2010-07-23
Location : The Netherlands

http://www.handresearch.com

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:30 am

Martijn (admin) wrote:
Patti wrote:
Patti wrote:
Martijn (admin) wrote:
... Regarding your left index finger, yes there are some irregular ridge lines inside but these do not make any well defined pattern, nor a triradius, etc. - though I do see 5 ending ridge lines in a row in the upper center of the loop.

So, therefore we can simply continue to speak about an ULNAR LOOP.

Although the newer print does clearly show that there is a triradius, I noticed in your description here, Martijn, that you have suggested a lack of a triradius results in a loop, but if there were not triradius, in this case, it would have been a tented arch.

(p.s.: I think Kiwi was aware of the innermost parallel lines creating the type lines in her drawing.)

Hi Patti,

No, in that passage I considered the possibility of the presence of a second triradius at the center of the pattern area. And because there is no such second triradius... the fingerprint can not be a whorl, and therefore resulting in a loop.

(The context outside the quoted-passage in the other topic should have made you understand this - sorrry, I don't recall in which topic I made that comment)

Ok thanks Martijn, that makes sense. Here's the link:
http://www.modernhandreadingforum.com/t591p15-life-purpose-reading-please-from-fingerprints
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  kiwihands on Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:41 am

deleted


Last edited by kiwihands on Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:09 pm; edited 1 time in total

kiwihands

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-01-09
Location : nowhere

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:04 am

lol! don't take my word for it Laughing

I've been looking for a sample with just a rod and one recurve that involves the type lines and this first 'ridge count' ridge that is out in front of the delta.

Take a look at these samples:

deleted deleted Fig041-044

I guess the core is not on the rod because the rod is below the shoulders, on the samples with rods.



Last edited by Patti on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:19 am; edited 2 times in total
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:09 am

Maybe the top of the rod can't be the core because the shoulders can't be placed on the spoiled loop...?

Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:26 am

deleted deleted Fig176-181

Take a look at 179 and 180. The only recurve is spoiled in 180 and they call it a loop.

Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  kiwihands on Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:07 pm

Awesome, you got it Patti! Thumbs up!
Example 180 was what I overlooked. Makes sense now, thank you!

kiwihands

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-01-09
Location : nowhere

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Patti on Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:27 am

kiwihands wrote:Awesome, you got it Patti! Thumbs up!
Example 180 was what I overlooked. Makes sense now, thank you!

But... I think 180 is a tented arch because the only recurve is spoiled by an appendage.
Patti
Patti

Posts : 3912
Join date : 2010-07-24

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  kiwihands on Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:31 am

Haha, ok... so even the FBI book can get it wrong. study

kiwihands

Posts : 364
Join date : 2011-01-09
Location : nowhere

Back to top Go down

deleted deleted Empty Re: deleted deleted

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum