can the line on your palm that indicate how many kids you will have be wrong ever

How are the lines that indicate that you will have kids.
Have you seen anyone who had these lines but had no kids and was perhaps long past he age for having kids.

toosh wrote:How are the lines that indicate that you will have kids.
Have you seen anyone who had these lines but had no kids and was perhaps long past he age for having kids.

I havn't seen the case you have mentioned Toosh.
However, the palmistry literature says these are unreliable markers. A pet, treated as a kid may also be indicated by these lines, is what some ppl say!
There is also confusion with medical stigmata lines.

Hi Kiran,
I'm interested to know what you mean by confusion regarding the medical stigmata lines?

Sucom wrote:Hi Kiran,
I'm interested to know what you mean by confusion regarding the medical stigmata lines?

Hi Sucom, since they are placed under the Mercury finger, at times they appear to stand above or cross the line of partner(marriage lines).
The lines standing on this line of marriage are considered as the lines of children.
Thats why I said - its confusing with medical stigmata.

Ahhh, I see what you mean. I thought I had perhaps missed some information about the healing/samaritan lines

Dear Toosh,

Some of the old palmist of the 20th Century like Benham and Cheiro (there are others too) take the vertical lines on the relationship lines to indicate children you will have. Now in Western Countries where the population is much less it may also refer to the number of pets you have. I have seen people with these lines not having children but those have no such lines may have children or not I have so far not come across.

toosh wrote:How are the lines that indicate that you will have kids.
Have you seen anyone who had these lines but had no kids and was perhaps long past he age for having kids.

Because these lines are so difficult to see at times, especially when the skin is very smooth as in the case of ladies, it becomes a difficult task to make out correctly these lines but to say they do not represent your children at all is a misnomer because I have many many cases where it has come out right though the number and gender of children have gone wrong at times but on a very high scale it has gone right. YOu cannot discount the right you see just because certain readings go wrong. Majority is always followed even by the researchers too.

Human mind is so complex that no matter how much you try it becomes difficult to decipher it. When there are many many lines on the relationship lines then we know by commonsense no one can have so many children and then I have successfully predicted after reasoning that this person loves children. After that I read in somewhere (I do not recall where) that the prominent one among those lines represent your own children. I take these cases on Indians and people with likewise culture, for we are not so much fond of pets to have them on palms -- again here the majority will apply.

Children are not got so easily as we know nowadays ladies have so many problems conceiving that we have to go to specialist and so on but pets can be easily had. It is therefore I refer to these lines representing to children more than the pets. I read such lines are generally to be seen on women as they are more attached to their children but in my palm I have very clear 2 prominent lines thin, clear, straight and sharp. In between these two lines are very short two lines barely touching the relationship line and hence 2 abortions.

So I follow this method.

Pravin Kumar