The financial finger is Little finger or Middle finger

Hello all

I was reading johny fincham website and he mention the little finger to be the financial finger, do we need to look at right mercury finger or left finger for finanace. Please provide some ideas. I was thinking that middle finger or saturn finger is what we should be looking at for finance.

Thanks
Anand

I think the middle finger is more about security, responsibility and a person's sense of values or work ethics.

Hello Patti

Thanks for the reply, this is what johny website mentions
http://www.johnnyfincham.com/finger_antenna.php.

What confuses me is i always think finance and responsbility are linked which is where iam confused. Books mention mercurian are shrewd, calculative ect..

when they mention security then financial strength is needed.
Thanks
Anand

Hi Anand,

Saturn finger is related to values and security. One of measuring value is thru money, one way of getting security is money, land, properties, goal etc.

Mercury finger is also finance related( See - its specifically stressed on FINANCE, not on SECURITY as is with Saturn finger). However, its more in terms of business. Say - I am very specific about the monetary exchanges in business, I may be cunning in my business approach, I may be very good at negotiation for property/dealings.
Things to do with business - an exchange of goods/services with money and its dealings.

Hope, this was useful.

Warm regards,
Kiran

Hello Kiran

Thanks fo reply, Basically the right mercury finger is partly finance related. Then how come it is also mentioned about communication.

Hello all

WHich finger is related to math ability.

Thanks
Anand

anand_palm wrote:Hello Kiran

Thanks fo reply, Basically the right mercury finger is partly finance related. Then how come it is also mentioned about communication.

Hello all

WHich finger is related to math ability.

Thanks
Anand

Hello Anand,

I wonder if finances can be made from just one finger only.Palmistry is about combination I guess.Otherwise based on the length of mercury finger only you can rank all in the Forbes List.

Regards
Raman

Hello Matrijn

Thanks for reply, risk taking ability is based on 2d:4d ratio, but that can be related to any kind of risk. In case of financial finger which implies people who are good in understanding financial part like investment ect there has to be some finger which plays a good role. of course the overall hand has to be looked at understand whether there is risk taking ability is present eventhough the person could be financial genius. Like for example what patti mentioned is that saturn finger is related to responsibilty, values and other attributes. likewise in charlotte wolfe book she had mentioned that mercury finger on passive hand represents about subconcious behavior (which could imply more on sexual communication).
Like wise index finger represents conciuosness which is more on self reflection. since the nerves are connected the combination become more complex to understand, however there are certain charecteristic which a finger represents.

risk is more about decision making ability hence it has to be combination of fingers, whereas finance requires understanding about how money works for which iam not sure whether it is combination of middle finger and little finger or somethingh else.

Thanks
Anand

Hello Martijn,

Yes,Indian palmistry has reference to only the mercury finger for making money.
V.A.K.Ayer quoting another author wrote "the man will make money by day and night".
Also K.C.Sen commented that "No person ever rose to distinction without a long Mercury Finger"

Both references produced verbatim.And still my interactions with some palmsits have the same views.But I have my reservations though.

Do you have any study ith statistics to confirm this?And more so even predictive aspects have combinations too.Guess horary astrology will confirm this.

Now to your article.Yes.. I can relate.But refer the last paragraph.Moreso I think its the inherent prepensity to take risks than the ability to make money.And anyways with lower 2D:4D ratios can you assure a 100% win is speculation?.Its only a tendency to take risks.

Refer your earlier post for propensities for a gambler.Where more than the amount of money made its the thrill of seeing the balling rolling on the table.And your article posted earlier had confrmed (you can comfirm for may be I miss a few observations) that low set thumb,a long ring finger are what makes for a compulsive gambler.

My Regards

Raman