About my life purpose

Roberta wrote:Dear Edmund,

Please don't give your power away by allowing yourself to be put into a limiting little box by some one-size-fits-all "system".

You can absolutely do and be anything that you choose. The lessons and purpose of your life are under YOUR command. (And I suspect they change as we grow and evolve as human and spiritual beings.)

Go for it!!

Warm wishes,
Roberta

edmund scissorHand wrote:good day to all

i have read richard 's book and i have a question .

there is a life purpose there called mentor to leader or artist .

if i don't have this highest print , i won't get the best satisfaction as mentor to leader or artists . but what if i really want to become that , but it says that's not my life purpose . it's a little bit discouraging you know. can somebody enlighten me ppplease? thank you...

Hello again Edmund Scissorhands!


Uhm... I am wondering: have you considered the possibility to use your life purpose (according Richard's system), in order to become a mentor in some kind of profession?

If you know how to follow your heart, let your feet do the walking.
If don't know how to do that... maybe you are interested to share your fingerprints with us?


PS. Your request sounds a bit like you have taken the words 'mentor', 'leader', and 'artist' too litterally. Because I believe that Richard's system is not designed for profession-choice, for, a large part of his terminology does not point towards a specific type of profession.

jeanette wrote:Can somebody help me. This is my fingerprints starting from the thumb.
The right hand loop, tented arch, loop, loop and loop.
Left hand loop, tented arch, tented arch, tented arch and loop.
So I am in the school of wisdom, which means true commitment, and my life purpose is success, responsibility, creativity, insight plus true commitment.

My lowest ranking fingerprints mean powerlessness, blocked passions, guilt issues and guilt fears.Meaning weak commitments and indecision.It then says my life lesson is and you have to write it in and I don't know what it is.
Thanks,
Jeanette.

jeanette wrote:Hi Martijin,
I do not know what Edward Scissorhands means.
Jeanette.

jeanette wrote:Hi Patti,
I was just thinking, one time you suggested lipstick for fingerprints, well I have not found this very successful and I am wondering if there is a shade recommended. The lipstick I used was very red. Is a lighter shade better.
Jeanette.

jeanette wrote:I am still not any the wiser and where am I supposed to start this new topic and you say this topic is focused on his fingerprints. I thought these were my fingerprints and why am I saying this, for I know these are my fingerprints.

jeanette wrote:Thanks Martijin,
Sorry I thought you were saying these were Scissorhands fingerprints.

Aha, thanks for explaining.


PS. Jeanette, I just noticed that Patti adressed the issue as well in this topic that you created yourself a few days ago:
https://www.modernhandreadingforum.com/t1343-life-lesson-and-purpose#13745

Maybe it would be best if you re-post the question about your fingerprint-combination in that topic?

Martijn (admin) wrote:

edmund scissorHand wrote:good day to all

i have read richard 's book and i have a question .

there is a life purpose there called mentor to leader or artist .

if i don't have this highest print , i won't get the best satisfaction as mentor to leader or artists . but what if i really want to become that , but it says that's not my life purpose . it's a little bit discouraging you know. can somebody enlighten me ppplease? thank you...

Hello again Edmund Scissorhands!


Uhm... I am wondering: have you considered the possibility to use your life purpose (according Richard's system), in order to become a mentor in some kind of profession?

If you know how to follow your heart, let your feet do the walking.
If don't know how to do that... maybe you are interested to share your fingerprints with us?


PS. Your request sounds a bit like you have taken the words 'mentor', 'leader', and 'artist' too litterally. Because I believe that Richard's system is not designed for profession-choice, for, a large part of his terminology does not point towards a specific type of profession.